July 20, 2026Methodology v2.2 · Data: BLS, 20102025
Political Grades
government — just the stats

CongressWest Virginia

Shelley Moore Capito

U.S. Senator, West Virginia · Republican · in office since Jan. 3, 2021

Shelley Moore Capito
U.S. Senator · West Virginia · Republican · in the Senate since Jan. 2015
Overall grade · among senators
No. 26 of 91
−0.00σ · 64% of the grade measured
How this grade is built
35%Bills they move (LES)+0.13
30%West Virginia: trend + condition (12% condition, 11.5y served)−0.13
25%Alignment (promises vs. votes)reserved
10%Attendancereserved
West Virginia outcomes over their Senate service
CategoryLatestScore vs. peers
Education scale score260.824−1.35σ
Air quality AQI4024+0.14σ
Water quality % of community systems31.525−2.50σ
Unemployment %4.225+1.19σ
Health coverage % of adults 18-649.724−0.25σ
Tax burden % of personal income7.124+0.42σ
Energy cost cents/kWh15.124−0.43σ
Cost of living index, US=10089.524−0.46σ
Crime deaths per 100,0005.924+0.82σ
Teen births per 1,000 females 15-1917.824+0.12σ
Wellbeing mean days of past 305.824+0.91σ
Obesity % of adults41.424+0.75σ
Early literacy % of 4th graders47.424−0.40σ
Gun deaths deaths per 100,000 (age-adjusted)15.324+2.50σ
Food-aid access index (higher = easier access)0.823−0.11σ
Jobless-benefit access % of unemployed receiving UI24.424−0.53σ
Their own recordValue
Legislative effectiveness LES · chamber avg = 1.0
0.94
Missed votes3.0%
Ideology 0 = left · 1 = right (GovTrack)0.74
Promises keptIn human review

A senator’s constituency is the whole state, so they are scored on the same verified state outcomes as the governor — ranked against other senators — alongside their own legislative record. Influence is shared with 99 colleagues and the governor; the score shows relative movement, not sole credit. Methodology v2.2

What Capito voted to fund

These pies aggregate the largest verified spending items — appropriations and mandatory outlays — in the bills Capito cast a recorded vote on, sliced by category, every dollar quoted from the bill text. Authorizations, guarantee ceilings and pay-fors are excluded, exactly as on the bill pages. This shows what the bills contained, by Capito’s own votes — not a claim that Capito wrote the spending or that it did or didn’t work. Click any slice to read the cited line-items.

Voted to fund — every dollar, cited

income security$215.5B

veterans$146.9B

  • VA Medical Services — inpatient/outpatient care for veterans (FY2025 advance appropriation)$71,000,000,000
    H.R. 4366 — read the cited text →
  • Appropriation to the Cost of War Toxic Exposures Fund for veterans' health care (PACT Act), available Oct 1 2024Dept. of Veterans Affairs - Cost of War Toxic Exposures Fund$24,455,000,000
    H.R. 3746 — read the cited text →
  • VA Medical Community Care — care at non-Department facilities (FY2025 advance appropriation)$20,382,000,000
    H.R. 4366 — read the cited text →
  • Appropriation to the Cost of War Toxic Exposures Fund for veterans' health care (PACT Act), available Oct 1 2023Dept. of Veterans Affairs - Cost of War Toxic Exposures Fund$20,268,000,000
    H.R. 3746 — read the cited text →
  • Veterans Benefits Administration — General Operating Expenses$3,899,000,000
    H.R. 4366 — read the cited text →
  • Mandatory appropriation to the Medical Facilities account for the 31 FY2023 major medical facility leasesDepartment of Veterans Affairs (Medical Facilities account)$1,880,000,000
    S. 3373 — read the cited text →
  • Mandatory appropriation to enter into enhanced-use leases of VA property (FY2022)Department of Veterans Affairs$922,000,000
    S. 3373 — read the cited text →
  • Mandatory appropriation to the Medical Facilities account for major medical facility leases (FY2031)Department of Veterans Affairs (Medical Facilities account)$650,000,000
    S. 3373 — read the cited text →
  • Mandatory appropriation to the Medical Facilities account for major medical facility leases (FY2030)Department of Veterans Affairs (Medical Facilities account)$620,000,000
    S. 3373 — read the cited text →
  • Mandatory appropriation to the Medical Facilities account for major medical facility leases (FY2029)Department of Veterans Affairs (Medical Facilities account)$610,000,000
    S. 3373 — read the cited text →
  • Mandatory appropriation to the Medical Facilities account for major medical facility leases (FY2028)Department of Veterans Affairs (Medical Facilities account)$600,000,000
    S. 3373 — read the cited text →
  • Initial mandatory appropriation seeding the Cost of War Toxic Exposures Fund (FY2022)Cost of War Toxic Exposures Fund$500,000,000
    S. 3373 — read the cited text →
  • Mandatory appropriation to the Medical Facilities account for major medical facility leases (FY2027)Department of Veterans Affairs (Medical Facilities account)$450,000,000
    S. 3373 — read the cited text →
  • Mandatory appropriation to the Medical Facilities account for major medical facility leases (FY2026)Department of Veterans Affairs (Medical Facilities account)$400,000,000
    S. 3373 — read the cited text →
  • Mandatory appropriation to the Medical Facilities account for major medical facility leases (FY2025)Department of Veterans Affairs (Medical Facilities account)$200,000,000
    S. 3373 — read the cited text →
  • Mandatory appropriation to the Medical Facilities account for major medical facility leases (FY2024)Department of Veterans Affairs (Medical Facilities account)$100,000,000
    S. 3373 — read the cited text →

transportation$141.3B

energy$72.2B

commerce & housing credit$67.0B

broadband$65.9B

science$40.0B

water$36.2B

defense$31.2B

other$24.9B

community & regional development$7.7B

environment$2.6B

health$676.0M

education$200.0M

  • CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2025 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)National Science Foundation$50,000,000
    H.R. 4346 — read the cited text →
  • CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2026 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)National Science Foundation$50,000,000
    H.R. 4346 — read the cited text →
  • CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2027 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)National Science Foundation$50,000,000
    H.R. 4346 — read the cited text →
  • CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2023 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)National Science Foundation$25,000,000
    H.R. 4346 — read the cited text →
  • CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2024 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)National Science Foundation$25,000,000
    H.R. 4346 — read the cited text →

Voted against — every dollar, cited

community & regional development$405.0B

education$162.4B

health$104.2B

other$102.4B

income security$85.8B

transportation$61.6B

commerce & housing credit$60.9B

energy$55.9B

agriculture$22.3B

broadband$17.2B

veterans$14.5B

water$4.0B

  • Bureau of Reclamation drought-mitigation grants/contracts in the Reclamation (Western) StatesBureau of Reclamation — Reclamation States (Colorado River Basin)$4,000,000,000
    H.R. 5376 — read the cited text →

Federal spending during Capito’s current term

Total U.S. federal outlays for each fiscal year of Capito’s current term. This is the whole federal budget — mostly Social Security, Medicare, defense, interest on the debt, and prior commitments — not money Capito personally directed. A president proposes and Congress appropriates; no single official controls it.

FY21
$6.82T−$2.77T deficit
FY22
$6.27T−$1.37T deficit
FY23
$6.13T−$1.69T deficit
FY24
$6.74T−$1.82T deficit
FY25
$7.01T−$1.77T deficit

Source: OMB Historical Tables, Table 1.1 (Summary of Receipts, Outlays, and Surpluses or Deficits: 1789-present) · figures. Nominal dollars, by fiscal year (Oct–Sep).

How Capito is graded

A senator’s constituency is the whole state, so Capito is graded on the same verified state outcomes as the governor — measured as the change on their watch versus the other 49 states, capped because influence is shared with 99 colleagues, the governor and a world economy — blended with what they personally control: how effectively they move legislation and how they vote. Every part decomposes on the card above, and the “measured” figure says how much of the grade is real versus still reserved.

Legislative Effectiveness Scores come from the Center for Effective Lawmaking, which benchmarks each chamber’s average to 1.0. Voting statistics come from GovTrack. The Honesty ledger — promises matched against this member’s votes — publishes only with an evidence trail and two agreeing human reviews.