H.R. 4346 — CHIPS and Science Act of 2022
Official title: An Act making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2022, and for other purposes (enacted as the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022; Public Law 117-167).
The CHIPS and Science Act: appropriations for semiconductor manufacturing incentives and R&D plus science-agency programs, enacted inside a repurposed Legislative Branch appropriations shell — which is why the formal title mentions neither chips nor science.
What the tracked text contains
Of the money itself: $54.2B across 27 tracked line-items — commerce & housing credit ($45.0B, 83%), science ($5.0B, 9%) and defense ($2.0B, 4%) lead; 3 smaller categories carry the rest. The largest single line: $19,000,000,000 for CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 portion for semiconductor manufacturing incentives (grants/financial assistance, NDAA sec. 9902). Beyond the cash, the text also sets $54.2B of authorizations (a ceiling on future spending) and $75.0B of loan-guarantee ceilings — disclosed beside the total, never summed into it. The dated money runs fiscal 2022–2027 — 99% of tracked dollars carry a year in the text.
If the title matched the money, it would be the “Semiconductor Subsidies and Science Act of 2022”.
117th Congress · Enrolled (enacted, Public Law) · sponsor not yet verified for this record · signed into law Aug. 9, 2022 · read the full bill text →
Where the money goes
$54.2B across 27 tracked items · compare against another law →The largest verified line-items. This pie breaks down the biggest spending items in the bill — appropriations and mandatory (direct) spending — by category. Every dollar is quoted from the text; click any slice to read them. It is not necessarily every dollar in the bill, and the gaps are not always small ones — where an account was left out, How this was built at the foot of this page says so and why, and a large omission can change which category ranks first. Figures that aren’t spending — authorizations, guarantee ceilings, pay-fors, and carve-outs already counted — are deliberately left out and disclosed below.
The money map
blocks sized by dollars — open one for the law’s own wordsArea is dollars. Each block is one category of tracked spending in H.R. 4346, sized by its share of the $54.2B this page tracks. Open a block and it lists the line-items inside it, each with the passage of the enacted text that carries the dollar figure, quoted word for word, and the section it sits in. Category names are the extraction’s own labels, printed as they come — nothing here calls a category worthwhile or wasteful. The quote is the argument.
This map divides the same tracked total the pie above divides — money the text writes as exact dollar lines. It is not the bill’s total fiscal effect: what the extraction leaves out is stated above the pie and in How this was built at the foot of this page, and the dollars deliberately kept out of the count are listed under the map.
2 of the 6 blocks are too small to carry a label without overprinting themselves, so they are drawn blank — every category is named, with its figures, in the rows and the table below.
commerce & housing credit$45.0B
$45,000,000,000 · 83% of the $54,219,400,000 this page tracks · 5 tracked line-items, largest first
- CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 portion for semiconductor manufacturing incentives (grants/financial assistance, NDAA sec. 9902)$19,000,000,000
“…until expended, of which $19,000,000,000 shall be for…”
Division A (CHIPS Act of 2022), Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 - CHIPS for America Fund, FY2023 appropriation (semiconductor manufacturing incentives + R&D)$7,000,000,000
“…(ii)for fiscal year 2023, $7,000,000,000 to remain available…”
Division A, Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2023 - CHIPS for America Fund, FY2026 appropriation (semiconductor manufacturing incentives + R&D)$6,600,000,000
“…and (v)for fiscal year 2026, $6,600,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2026 - CHIPS for America Fund, FY2024 appropriation (semiconductor manufacturing incentives + R&D)$6,300,000,000
“…116–283; (iii)for fiscal year 2024, $6,300,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2024 - CHIPS for America Fund, FY2025 appropriation (semiconductor manufacturing incentives + R&D)$6,100,000,000
“…(iv)for fiscal year 2025, $6,100,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2025
These same line-items appear in the full cited ledger lower on this page, where each one also carries the fiscal year the text gives it, when it gives one.
science$5.0B
$5,000,000,000 · 9% of the $54,219,400,000 this page tracks · 3 tracked line-items, largest first
- CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 portion for the National Advanced Packaging Manufacturing Program (NDAA sec. 9906(d))$2,500,000,000
“…Public Law 116–283, $2,500,000,000 shall be for…”
Division A, Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 (sec. 9906(d)) - CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 portion for the National Semiconductor Technology Center (NDAA sec. 9906(c))$2,000,000,000
“…Public Law 116–283, $2,000,000,000 shall be for…”
Division A, Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 (sec. 9906(c)) - CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 portion for microelectronics metrology R&D and Manufacturing USA (NDAA sec. 9906(e)-(f))$500,000,000
“…Law 116–283, and $500,000,000 shall be for…”
Division A, Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 (sec. 9906(e)&(f))
These same line-items appear in the full cited ledger lower on this page, where each one also carries the fiscal year the text gives it, when it gives one.
defense$2.0B
$2,000,000,000 · 4% of the $54,219,400,000 this page tracks · 5 tracked line-items, largest first
- CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2023 (DoD microelectronics; $400M/yr FY2023-2027, $2,000,000,000 total)$400,000,000→ Department of Defense
“…otherwise appropriated— (A)for fiscal year 2023, $400,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(b)(2) — CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2023 - CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2024 (DoD microelectronics; $400M/yr FY2023-2027, $2,000,000,000 total)$400,000,000→ Department of Defense
“…(B)for fiscal year 2024, $400,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(b)(2) — CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2024 - CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2025 (DoD microelectronics; $400M/yr FY2023-2027, $2,000,000,000 total)$400,000,000→ Department of Defense
“…30, 2024; (C)for fiscal year 2025, $400,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(b)(2) — CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2025 - CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2026 (DoD microelectronics; $400M/yr FY2023-2027, $2,000,000,000 total)$400,000,000→ Department of Defense
“…(D)for fiscal year 2026, $400,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(b)(2) — CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2026 - CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2027 (DoD microelectronics; $400M/yr FY2023-2027, $2,000,000,000 total)$400,000,000→ Department of Defense
“…2026; and (E)for fiscal year 2027, $400,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(b)(2) — CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2027
These same line-items appear in the full cited ledger lower on this page, where each one also carries the fiscal year the text gives it, when it gives one.
broadband$1.5B
$1,500,000,000 · 3% of the $54,219,400,000 this page tracks · 2 tracked line-items, largest first
- Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund, FY2023 (Open RAN / wireless supply chain innovation)$1,350,000,000→ NTIA (Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund)
“…2031; and (2)$1,350,000,000 for fiscal year 2023, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 106 — Appropriations for wireless supply chain innovation - Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund, FY2022 (Open RAN / wireless supply chain; $1.5B total with FY2023)$150,000,000→ NTIA (Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund)
“…(1)$150,000,000 for fiscal year 2022, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 106 — Appropriations for wireless supply chain innovation
These same line-items appear in the full cited ledger lower on this page, where each one also carries the fiscal year the text gives it, when it gives one.
other$519.4M
$519,400,000 · 1% of the $54,219,400,000 this page tracks · 7 tracked line-items, largest first
- CHIPS International Technology Security & Innovation Fund, FY2023 ($100M/yr; $500,000,000 total)$100,000,000→ Dept. of State / USAID / EXIM / DFC
“…(i)for fiscal year 2023, $100,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(c)(2) — CHIPS Int'l Tech Security & Innovation Fund, FY2023 - CHIPS International Technology Security & Innovation Fund, FY2024 ($100M/yr; $500,000,000 total)$100,000,000→ Dept. of State / USAID / EXIM / DFC
“…30, 2027; (ii)for fiscal year 2024, $100,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(c)(2) — CHIPS Int'l Tech Security & Innovation Fund, FY2024 - CHIPS International Technology Security & Innovation Fund, FY2025 ($100M/yr; $500,000,000 total)$100,000,000→ Dept. of State / USAID / EXIM / DFC
“…(iii)for fiscal year 2025, $100,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(c)(2) — CHIPS Int'l Tech Security & Innovation Fund, FY2025 - CHIPS International Technology Security & Innovation Fund, FY2026 ($100M/yr; $500,000,000 total)$100,000,000→ Dept. of State / USAID / EXIM / DFC
“…30, 2029; (iv)for fiscal year 2026, $100,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(c)(2) — CHIPS Int'l Tech Security & Innovation Fund, FY2026 - CHIPS International Technology Security & Innovation Fund, FY2027 ($100M/yr; $500,000,000 total)$100,000,000→ Dept. of State / USAID / EXIM / DFC
“…(v)for fiscal year 2027, $100,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(c)(2) — CHIPS Int'l Tech Security & Innovation Fund, FY2027 - Supplemental appropriation for U.S. Marshals Service to address threats to the Supreme Court$10,300,000→ U.S. Marshals Service (Dept. of Justice)
“…additional amount for Salaries and Expenses, $10,300,000, to remain…”
Division C, Title I — Dept. of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service, Salaries and Expenses - Supplemental appropriation for the Supreme Court to address threats to the Supreme Court$9,100,000→ Supreme Court of the United States
“…additional amount for Salaries and Expenses, $9,100,000, to remain…”
Division C, Title II — The Judiciary, Supreme Court of the United States, Salaries and Expenses
These same line-items appear in the full cited ledger lower on this page, where each one also carries the fiscal year the text gives it, when it gives one.
education$200.0M
$200,000,000 · 0.4% of the $54,219,400,000 this page tracks · 5 tracked line-items, largest first
- CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2025 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)$50,000,000→ National Science Foundation
“…(C)for fiscal year 2025, $50,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(d)(2) — CHIPS Workforce and Education Fund, FY2025 - CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2026 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)$50,000,000→ National Science Foundation
“…until expended; (D)for fiscal year 2026, $50,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(d)(2) — CHIPS Workforce and Education Fund, FY2026 - CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2027 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)$50,000,000→ National Science Foundation
“…(E)for fiscal year 2027, $50,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(d)(2) — CHIPS Workforce and Education Fund, FY2027 - CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2023 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)$25,000,000→ National Science Foundation
“…(A)for fiscal year 2023, $25,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(d)(2) — CHIPS Workforce and Education Fund, FY2023 - CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2024 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)$25,000,000→ National Science Foundation
“…until expended; (B)for fiscal year 2024, $25,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(d)(2) — CHIPS Workforce and Education Fund, FY2024
These same line-items appear in the full cited ledger lower on this page, where each one also carries the fiscal year the text gives it, when it gives one.
- Authorizations (a ceiling on future spending) · 11 tracked items$54.2B
- Loan-guarantee ceilings · 1 tracked item$75.0B
None of these are added to the map. They are ceilings, borrowing limits, carve-outs of dollars already counted inside a block above, or pay-fors — summing them into the map would count the same money twice and draw permission to spend as spending. Each is itemized further down this page.
| Category | Tracked dollars | Share of $54,219,400,000 | Line-items |
|---|---|---|---|
| commerce & housing credit | $45,000,000,000 | 83% | 5 |
| science | $5,000,000,000 | 9% | 3 |
| defense | $2,000,000,000 | 4% | 5 |
| broadband | $1,500,000,000 | 3% | 2 |
| other | $519,400,000 | 1% | 7 |
| education | $200,000,000 | 0.4% | 5 |
| Tracked total | $54,219,400,000 | 100% | 27 |
What’s in this bill
every mechanism we could extract, at one scaleA law can move money four different ways, and only one of them is cash. This compares what H.R. 4346 actually spends against what it authorizes, caps, guarantees or pays for. Every bar is a sample. Each one sums the tracked line-items in that mechanism — the largest figures that appear in the text as an exact dollar string — so a bar is a floor, not a mechanism total, and on some laws it is a small fraction of one. Each bar carries its item count and, where the items carry years, the span it covers and where those years came from.
These bars are not added together. Only the top bar is money leaving the Treasury. The rest are ceilings, borrowing limits, carve-outs of money already counted above, or pay-fors — summing them would count the same dollars twice and treat permission to spend as spending. How this was built says what each extraction left out.
What CBO says it does to the deficit
verified estimate, quoted with its basisCBO put its deficit increase at $79 billion over 2022–2032 (mandatory and revenue effects only — the law's semiconductor appropriations are additional discretionary money on top of this figure.) Source: CBO, Legislation Enacted in the Second Session of the 117th Congress · CBO, cost estimate for H.R. 4346 as amended
This same estimate sits beside each member’s recorded vote on their page and feeds the grade’s fiscal-conduct block — see the methodology.
The terms on this page, in plain English
What these things actually are — and what this bill does to each of them. Written for readers, not staffers; every figure in the “in this bill” lines appears elsewhere on this page.
Authorization (“authorized to be appropriated”)
Permission, not money. “There is authorized to be appropriated $X” sets a ceiling on what a future spending bill may provide — and if that later bill never passes, not a dollar moves. Much of a landmark law's famous headline number is this kind of permission, which is why this site never adds it to the spending total.
Loan-guarantee ceiling
The government co-signing loans, not spending money. The figure caps how much new lending the government may promise to stand behind; cash leaves the Treasury only if borrowers default. These ceilings can dwarf a bill's actual spending — which is exactly why they are shown separately and never summed into it.
CHIPS for America Fund
The subsidy pot for semiconductor manufacturing — grants and incentives for companies building chip factories in the United States, plus research money. The account was created earlier (in a defense law); what made it real was a later bill actually putting money in.
In this bill: This is that later bill: the $19 billion first-year appropriation to the fund is this page's largest line, with further yearly installments behind it.
What it should actually be called
“The Please Build Your Chip Factory Here Act”
Light-hearted, but earned — every word of it is accounted for in the figures and terms above.
When the money is for
fiscal years the tracked line-items carry25 of 27 tracked line-items carry a fiscal year — 21 named in the quoted text, 4 taken from the account heading the line is cited to, which is a hand-written annotation rather than a string-checked quote — 99% of the tracked dollars. The no year column is money the text appropriates without naming a year in the quoted passage; it is shown so the dated columns aren’t mistaken for the whole schedule.
How they voted
| For | Against | Abstained | Did not vote | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| House | 148 52% | 135 48% | 1 0% | — | 284 |
| Democrats | 139 99% | — | 1 1% | — | 140 |
| Republicans | 9 6% | 135 94% | — | — | 144 |
| Senate | 55 63% | 31 36% | — | 1 1% | 87 |
| Democrats | 43 100% | — | — | — | 43 |
| Republicans | 11 26% | 30 71% | — | 1 2% | 42 |
| Independents | 1 50% | 1 50% | — | — | 2 |
“Did not vote” is not the same as “absent.” The record distinguishes Present — there, and formally declining to take a side — from Not Voting, where no vote was cast. That is usually absence, but the roll call does not say so, so this table does not either.
Abstained (1): Sara Jacobs (D-CA).
Did not vote (1): Lisa Murkowski (R-AK).
A member is recorded as not voting for many ordinary reasons — illness, a death in the family, official travel, or a paired vote arranged with a colleague on the other side. The roll call gives no reason, so neither does this page, and nothing here is counted against anyone’s grade. This site tracks a small number of major bills, so a single absence is a large share of what is shown here and a very small share of the hundreds of votes a member actually casts.
These tallies count the 371 members sitting today who have a recorded position, not the historical result. Several of these bills passed in earlier Congresses, and members who have since left are not in the roster — so the totals here are smaller than the 435 + 100 that voted at the time. Where both chambers held a recorded vote, a member is grouped by the chamber they sit in now; anyone who has switched chambers since then appears in their current row.
Authorizations (a ceiling on future spending) — $54.2B
“There are authorized to be appropriated $X” sets a CAP on what a future appropriations bill may provide — it is permission, not money. Much of a landmark law’s headline figure is this. It is disclosed here, never summed into the pie, because the cash only exists if a later bill actually appropriates it.
- National Science Foundation total authorization of appropriations, FY2027 (final year of the 5-year ramp)$18.9BFY2027, from the account heading
- National Science Foundation total authorization of appropriations, FY2023 (ramps to $18.9B by FY2027)$11.9BFY2023, from the account heading
- Department of Energy Office of Science total authorization of appropriations, FY2023 (~$50B over FY2023-2027)$8.9BFY2023, from the account heading
- Regional Technology and Innovation Hubs program authorization, FY2025-2027 (EDA regional tech hubs)$7.0BFY2023
- DOE Basic Energy Sciences program authorization, FY2023 (within the DOE Office of Science total)$2.7BFY2023, from the account heading
- National Institute of Standards and Technology total authorization of appropriations, FY2023$1.6BFY2023, from the account heading
- Authorization for NSF's new Directorate for Technology, Innovation & Partnerships, FY2023 (within NSF R&RA total)$1.5BFY2023, from the account heading
- Distressed Area Recompete Pilot Program authorization (EDA grants to persistently distressed communities)$1.0B
- Construction of the Electron-Ion Collider, FY2027 (DOE nuclear physics user facility)$301.0M
- Construction of the Spallation Neutron Source Second Target Station, FY2025 (DOE Office of Science user facility)$279.0MFY2025, from the account heading
- Construction of the Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) for the international Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), FY2023 (~$1.35B FY2023-2027)$180.0MFY2023, from the account heading
Loan-guarantee ceilings — $75.0B
Caps on NEW loan or mortgage-backed-security guarantee commitments. No cash is spent — the government only backstops private lending — so these are excluded from the pie entirely.
- Ceiling on gross obligations for principal of direct loans/guarantees financed by the CHIPS Fund (NO cash outlay)$75.0B
Every tracked dollar, cited
27 spending line-items · 25 carry a fiscal yearcommerce & housing credit$45.0B · 83%
- CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 portion for semiconductor manufacturing incentives (grants/financial assistance, NDAA sec. 9902)$19,000,000,000FY2022, from the account heading
“…until expended, of which $19,000,000,000 shall be for…”
Division A (CHIPS Act of 2022), Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 - CHIPS for America Fund, FY2023 appropriation (semiconductor manufacturing incentives + R&D)$7,000,000,000FY2023
“…(ii)for fiscal year 2023, $7,000,000,000 to remain available…”
Division A, Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2023 - CHIPS for America Fund, FY2026 appropriation (semiconductor manufacturing incentives + R&D)$6,600,000,000FY2026
“…and (v)for fiscal year 2026, $6,600,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2026 - CHIPS for America Fund, FY2024 appropriation (semiconductor manufacturing incentives + R&D)$6,300,000,000FY2024
“…116–283; (iii)for fiscal year 2024, $6,300,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2024 - CHIPS for America Fund, FY2025 appropriation (semiconductor manufacturing incentives + R&D)$6,100,000,000FY2025
“…(iv)for fiscal year 2025, $6,100,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2025
science$5.0B · 9%
- CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 portion for the National Advanced Packaging Manufacturing Program (NDAA sec. 9906(d))$2,500,000,000FY2022, from the account heading
“…Public Law 116–283, $2,500,000,000 shall be for…”
Division A, Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 (sec. 9906(d)) - CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 portion for the National Semiconductor Technology Center (NDAA sec. 9906(c))$2,000,000,000FY2022, from the account heading
“…Public Law 116–283, $2,000,000,000 shall be for…”
Division A, Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 (sec. 9906(c)) - CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 portion for microelectronics metrology R&D and Manufacturing USA (NDAA sec. 9906(e)-(f))$500,000,000FY2022, from the account heading
“…Law 116–283, and $500,000,000 shall be for…”
Division A, Sec. 102(a)(2) — CHIPS for America Fund, FY2022 (sec. 9906(e)&(f))
defense$2.0B · 4%
- CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2023 (DoD microelectronics; $400M/yr FY2023-2027, $2,000,000,000 total)$400,000,000FY2023→ Department of Defense
“…otherwise appropriated— (A)for fiscal year 2023, $400,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(b)(2) — CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2023 - CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2024 (DoD microelectronics; $400M/yr FY2023-2027, $2,000,000,000 total)$400,000,000FY2024→ Department of Defense
“…(B)for fiscal year 2024, $400,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(b)(2) — CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2024 - CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2025 (DoD microelectronics; $400M/yr FY2023-2027, $2,000,000,000 total)$400,000,000FY2025→ Department of Defense
“…30, 2024; (C)for fiscal year 2025, $400,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(b)(2) — CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2025 - CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2026 (DoD microelectronics; $400M/yr FY2023-2027, $2,000,000,000 total)$400,000,000FY2026→ Department of Defense
“…(D)for fiscal year 2026, $400,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(b)(2) — CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2026 - CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2027 (DoD microelectronics; $400M/yr FY2023-2027, $2,000,000,000 total)$400,000,000FY2027→ Department of Defense
“…2026; and (E)for fiscal year 2027, $400,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(b)(2) — CHIPS for America Defense Fund, FY2027
broadband$1.5B · 3%
- Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund, FY2023 (Open RAN / wireless supply chain innovation)$1,350,000,000FY2023→ NTIA (Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund)
“…2031; and (2)$1,350,000,000 for fiscal year 2023, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 106 — Appropriations for wireless supply chain innovation - Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund, FY2022 (Open RAN / wireless supply chain; $1.5B total with FY2023)$150,000,000FY2022→ NTIA (Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund)
“…(1)$150,000,000 for fiscal year 2022, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 106 — Appropriations for wireless supply chain innovation
other$519.4M · 1%
- CHIPS International Technology Security & Innovation Fund, FY2023 ($100M/yr; $500,000,000 total)$100,000,000FY2023→ Dept. of State / USAID / EXIM / DFC
“…(i)for fiscal year 2023, $100,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(c)(2) — CHIPS Int'l Tech Security & Innovation Fund, FY2023 - CHIPS International Technology Security & Innovation Fund, FY2024 ($100M/yr; $500,000,000 total)$100,000,000FY2024→ Dept. of State / USAID / EXIM / DFC
“…30, 2027; (ii)for fiscal year 2024, $100,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(c)(2) — CHIPS Int'l Tech Security & Innovation Fund, FY2024 - CHIPS International Technology Security & Innovation Fund, FY2025 ($100M/yr; $500,000,000 total)$100,000,000FY2025→ Dept. of State / USAID / EXIM / DFC
“…(iii)for fiscal year 2025, $100,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(c)(2) — CHIPS Int'l Tech Security & Innovation Fund, FY2025 - CHIPS International Technology Security & Innovation Fund, FY2026 ($100M/yr; $500,000,000 total)$100,000,000FY2026→ Dept. of State / USAID / EXIM / DFC
“…30, 2029; (iv)for fiscal year 2026, $100,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(c)(2) — CHIPS Int'l Tech Security & Innovation Fund, FY2026 - CHIPS International Technology Security & Innovation Fund, FY2027 ($100M/yr; $500,000,000 total)$100,000,000FY2027→ Dept. of State / USAID / EXIM / DFC
“…(v)for fiscal year 2027, $100,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(c)(2) — CHIPS Int'l Tech Security & Innovation Fund, FY2027 - Supplemental appropriation for U.S. Marshals Service to address threats to the Supreme Court$10,300,000→ U.S. Marshals Service (Dept. of Justice)
“…additional amount for Salaries and Expenses, $10,300,000, to remain…”
Division C, Title I — Dept. of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service, Salaries and Expenses - Supplemental appropriation for the Supreme Court to address threats to the Supreme Court$9,100,000→ Supreme Court of the United States
“…additional amount for Salaries and Expenses, $9,100,000, to remain…”
Division C, Title II — The Judiciary, Supreme Court of the United States, Salaries and Expenses
education$200.0M · 0.4%
- CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2025 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)$50,000,000FY2025→ National Science Foundation
“…(C)for fiscal year 2025, $50,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(d)(2) — CHIPS Workforce and Education Fund, FY2025 - CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2026 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)$50,000,000FY2026→ National Science Foundation
“…until expended; (D)for fiscal year 2026, $50,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(d)(2) — CHIPS Workforce and Education Fund, FY2026 - CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2027 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)$50,000,000FY2027→ National Science Foundation
“…(E)for fiscal year 2027, $50,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(d)(2) — CHIPS Workforce and Education Fund, FY2027 - CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2023 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)$25,000,000FY2023→ National Science Foundation
“…(A)for fiscal year 2023, $25,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(d)(2) — CHIPS Workforce and Education Fund, FY2023 - CHIPS for America Workforce and Education Fund, FY2024 (NSF microelectronics workforce; $200,000,000 total)$25,000,000FY2024→ National Science Foundation
“…until expended; (B)for fiscal year 2024, $25,000,000, to remain…”
Division A, Sec. 102(d)(2) — CHIPS Workforce and Education Fund, FY2024
How this was built
Fetched the enrolled bill XML from GovInfo (response bytes decoded as UTF-8); produced faithful text via ElementTree itertext join; located each dollar figure by disambiguated substring search and extracted a newline-free, <=15-word verbatim quote; every amount and quote re-verified as an exact substring of that text. 39 of 39 sampled figures were re-located as exact strings in the source text. Source: GovInfo enrolled bill text. Full bill text.
Extraction notes (technical)
SOURCING: All line items are exact-verified substrings of the ENROLLED (enacted) bill text fetched from GovInfo (bytes decoded as UTF-8). H.R. 4346 became Public Law 117-167, signed Aug 9, 2022; it is popularly the 'CHIPS and Science Act of 2022.' The enrolled bill's formal long title is a Legislative Branch appropriations title because the CHIPS/Science text was substituted into the H.R. 4346 vehicle; Division A's own short title is 'CHIPS Act of 2022.' Sponsor of the underlying vehicle is not present in the enrolled XML, so sponsor is null (not fabricated). MECHANISMS (do NOT sum across them): (1) 'appropriation' = the CHIPS direct appropriations in Division A ('there is appropriated to the Fund ... out of amounts in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated') plus the two Division C Supreme Court-security supplementals ('The following sums are appropriated'). These are the only figures counted as spending; they total $54,219,400,000 = CHIPS for America Fund $50B (FY2022 $24B, of which $19B manufacturing incentives/$2B NSTC/$2.5B advanced packaging/$0.5B metrology; FY2023 $7B; FY2024 $6.3B; FY2025 $6.1B; FY2026 $6.6B) + Defense Fund $2B ($400M x5) + International Fund $0.5B ($100M x5) + Workforce & Education Fund $0.2B + Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation (Open RAN) Fund $1.5B + Division C $19.4M. Multi-year funds are enumerated by fiscal-year figure so the total is non-overlapping and matches the widely-cited ~$54.2B. The FY2022 '$19B/$2B/$2.5B/$0.5B' carve-outs sum to that year's $24B top line; do NOT add them to a separate $24B line. (2) 'loan_guarantee_ceiling' = the $75,000,000,000 gross-obligation limit on direct loans/guarantees financed from the Fund (Sec.102(a)(2)(B)); this backstops lending and spends NO cash — excluded from the pie. Within the appropriated $19B (FY2022 sec.9902) the Act also carves up to $6B for loan/guarantee SUBSIDY COST and $2B for mature-node ('legacy chip') assistance; these are USES of the $19B, not separate appropriations, so they are not listed separately (would double-count). (3) 'authorization' = the entire 'Science' half (Division B): 'there are authorized to be appropriated $X' is a CEILING on FUTURE appropriations, i.e., permission, NOT money. The headline ~$170B+ 'CHIPS and Science' figure is dominated by these authorizations (NSF ramps $11.9B->$18.9B/yr, ~$81B/5yr; DOE Office of Science ~$8.9B->$10.8B/yr, ~$50B/5yr; NIST ~$1.55B->$2.28B/yr; EDA Regional Tech Hubs $10B; etc.). Authorization sub-allocations are NESTED (title total -> program -> named project) and MUST NOT be summed with their parents: e.g. NSF's TIP Directorate ($1.5B FY2023) sits inside NSF's R&RA/total; Basic Energy Sciences ($2.685B FY2023) sits inside DOE Office of Science; and the named national-lab construction items (Fermilab PIP-II ~$1.35B, Electron-Ion Collider ~$1.09B, Spallation Neutron Source proton power upgrade ~$1.19B) are cited at one representative fiscal year and sit inside the DOE physics program authorizations. Congress.gov roll-call and per-project earmark tables are separate documents, not this text. TAX CREDIT NOT INCLUDED: Sec.107 creates the 25% Advanced Manufacturing Investment Credit (new IRC sec.48D) — '25 percent of the qualified investment ... with respect to any advanced manufacturing facility'; it carries NO dollar figure in the operative text. Its cost (~$24B/10yr per JCT/CBO) lives only in the CBO cost estimate (publication 58319, hr4346_chip.pdf). It is intentionally OMITTED as a line item because CBO's server returned HTTP 403 to programmatic fetch, so the figure could not be string-verified against a keyless source per the 'omit if unverifiable' rule. spending_source is therefore 'bill_text' (all shipped dollars are verbatim from the enrolled text).
How this lands in a state
three layers, in order: reported, read, shownPick a state and this section gives you three different things, and keeps them apart. First, what the government itself reports — obligations Treasury tags to this law, where such a tag exists. Second, an AI assessment written from this page’s verified record and that state’s published statistics, and checked against both before it was published here. Third, the state’s own numbers — the same rows the assessment was given, with their sources and vintages, so you can check the reading against the record it came from. Every state is treated identically.
1. What the government reports
no official per-state breakdown exists for this lawNo official source breaks H.R. 4346 down by state, so this page publishes no per-state dollar figure for it. DEFC '8' maps to P.L. 117-167 alone, so the join is well formed, but it is empty of CHIPS money. Three fiscal years of File C return 1,055 rows totalling MINUS $1,950,919 -- all of it U.S. Marshals Service payroll, and negative because it is net of deobligations. The semiconductor money moved as Commerce Department direct appropriations and tax credits that never became DEFC-tagged awards. A per-state map from this would be noise with a negative national total.
Two of the 31 laws tracked on this site can be broken down honestly — the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the American Rescue Plan Act — because Treasury tags their money with a Disaster Emergency Fund Code that maps to one public law and no other. Where no such code exists, a per-state figure would be modelled rather than derived, and this site does not publish modelled numbers.
The route we refuse to take, and why (technical)
USAspending's award SEARCH endpoints accept the same def_codes filter but select AWARDS, not DOLLARS: they return an award's entire obligation if any part of it touched the law's money. That route reported a single Sandia National Laboratories contract as $42.8B of IIJA money in New Mexico against a true DEFC-apportioned $64.5M, and overstated ARPA nationally by about 80%. It is not used here and must not be.
2. The assessment
AI-written, checked before publication — not the site’s voiceClaude (an AI model) read H.R. 4346’s verified line items and their quoted statutory text against each state’s published statistics, and reported how much of the law turns on anything measured there. Every reading was generated and checked before this page was published — against the same two records, by the same check the site applies — and one that failed the check was discarded rather than shown to anyone. It is not this site’s editorial voice. It is not a prediction and it is not advice. Every figure in it traces to the record below, and every provision it names carries statutory language quoted word for word. If it ever disagrees with a number on this page, the page is right. “Little connection” is a normal and expected answer.
Choose a state above to read it.
3. The state’s own numbers
the rows the assessment was givenChoose a state above to see the measured profile the assessment reads from — its industry mix, its concentrations, and its energy consumption, each with its source and vintage.
Ask about this bill
Ask a question and Claude (an AI model) answers it from this page’s verified record only — the line items, disclosures and CBO estimate shown above. Answers are AI-generated at your request, are not this site’s editorial voice, and will say so when the record doesn’t cover your question. If an answer ever disagrees with a number on the page, the page is right.