Gov. Healey was elected in 2022 and sworn in on Jan. 5, 2023. The scored record above covers Massachusetts's outcomes during this continuous service, lagged per category (each category's lag was fixed before scoring).
Governors › Massachusetts
Massachusetts Under Maura Healey
Democratic · Sworn in Jan. 5, 2023 · Now in 1st term
Massachusetts has tracked the typical state almost exactly under Gov. Healey — an early read across 3 categories, unranked until the data thickens.
The Executive Summary
Gov. Maura Healey (D) has held Massachusetts's governorship since Jan. 2023; Massachusetts is scored across 3 categories but not yet ranked — every category's window is still thin. On Healey's watch, tax burden (% of personal income) fell 6.50% → 6.45% while the typical state fell 6.29% → 5.98% between 2023 and 2024. Over the same service, unemployment rose 4.0% → 4.5% while the typical state rose 3.6% → 4.0% between 2024 and 2025. In all, of the 3 scored categories with data at both ends of their measured windows, 1 moved the right way on their own numbers and 1 moved the wrong way, with 1 holding about steady. These are movements on the governor's watch — shared with the legislature and the economy, and the window includes COVID-19 public health emergency (WHO PHEIC: Jan 30, 2020 – May 5, 2023) — association, not causation.
Maura Healey
Massachusetts · Democratic · since Jan. 2023 · 1st term
Overall · citizen-weighted
Early
−0.27σ · 3 of 20 categories
equal-weight: −0.20σ · weighting hurts
weights: Pew Research Center, Jan. 2024
| Category | Latest | Score vs. peers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honesty | — | Not numerically scored — see Integrity Record | |
| Spending discipline | — | Scoring rule in development | |
| Education scale score | 283.5 ’24 | Too early | |
| Air quality AQI | 37 ’24 | Insufficient data | |
| Water quality % of systems with a violation | 3.0 ’25 | +0.31σ* | |
| Unemployment % | 4.5 ’25 | −0.61σ* | |
| Health coverage % of adults 18-64 uninsured | 4.3 ’24 | Insufficient data | |
| Tax burden % of personal income | 6.5 ’24 | −0.29σ* | |
| Energy cost cents/kWh | 29.4 ’24 | Insufficient data | |
| Cost of living index, US=100 | 105.8 ’24 | Insufficient data | |
| Homicide age-adjusted deaths per 100,000 | 2.2 ’24 | Insufficient data | |
| Teen births per 1,000 females 15-19 | 5.4 ’24 | Insufficient data | |
| Wellbeing mean poor-mental-health days of 30 | 4.5 ’24 | Insufficient data | |
| School food quality | — | Scoring rule in development | |
| School shootings | 1 ’24 | Context · 2/10yr | |
| Obesity % of adults | 27.0 ’24 | Too early | |
| Early literacy % of 4th-graders below basic | 31.7 ’24 | Too early | |
| Gun deaths age-adjusted deaths per 100,000 | 3.8 ’24 | Insufficient data | |
| Food-aid access index (higher = easier access) | 1.2 ’23 | Too early | |
| Jobless-benefit access % of unemployed receiving UI | 41.2 ’24 | Insufficient data |
Data transparency — CDC BRFSS survey-years delivered: 2 of 2 in this governor’s window (the only state-run collection scored; BRFSS data through 2024)Full reporting
Each score blends where the state stands today with its trend over this governor’s window, vs. the other states with comparable data — 49 in most categories, fewer wherever a state-year is missing. Scores are in standard deviations (σ) — how far above or below the other states this one sits, where 0 is the middle of the pack and ±1 is a wide gap. *thin data (under 3 points). Tap ? on any row for what it measures, its chart, and the source. All provisional while the term runs. Methodology v3.0
The Rundown
An early read on Massachusetts — scored, not yet ranked.
Water quality (% of systems with a violation). Better than the typical state, and holding about steady: 3.0% → 3.0% while the typical state fell 5.2% → 4.9%.
Unemployment. Worse than the typical state, and losing ground: 4.0% → 4.5% while the typical state rose 3.6% → 4.0%. Worst category on the card.
Moved the wrong way on Healey's watch — 1 of 3 scored categories. unemployment 4 → 4.5. 1 moved the right way, 1 held about steady at the source's own precision. Judged by each category's own printed endpoints over its measured years — the score also weighs standing against other states, which is a different question.
Exogenous events inside this window — 1. COVID-19 public health emergency (WHO PHEIC: Jan 30, 2020 – May 5, 2023). Years these events touch are outliers on several series — those moves belong to the events at least as much as to anyone in office, so they are marked on every chart on this page, and no verdict here rests on a single year.
How this is scored: 60% is where Massachusetts stands against the other 49 states today — it is below average on 2 of 3 scored categories, and 40% is which way it moved on Gov. Healey's watch. The same weighting applies to every governor. Because standing is the larger half, this ranks state outcomes with the sitting governor named — Gov. Healey inherited much of it, and the movement half is what changed since.
Massachusetts’s debt on their watch
context — not this governor’s gradeWhen Gov. Healey took office in 2023, Massachusetts’s state government owed $67.5 billion (fiscal 2022; Census). The latest published figure is $65.9 billion (fiscal 2024 — the Census survey runs about two years behind). A state’s debt is set by budgets a governor proposes and signs, a legislature that writes and amends them, bond votes, and the economy — it is shared, which is why it is context here and not part of the grade. Figures cover the state government only, not cities, counties or school districts — and they count bonded debt, not unfunded pension obligations, which are a separate and often large part of what a state owes. Source: Census Bureau.
And the promises beyond the bonds
Bonded debt is not the whole of what a state owes. Public pension plans in Massachusetts have promised benefits valued at $199.8 billion against $103.8 billion actually held — an unfunded gap of $95.9 billion, 52% funded (2022, the latest year published). When Gov. Healey took office, the gap stood at $95.9 billion (2022). These promises accumulated over decades, under many governors and legislatures — the most inherited numbers on this page — and the figures cover defined-benefit pension plans sponsored by state and local governments for their employees, so local-government plans are included alongside the state’s own. Source: Federal Reserve.
Integrity Record
facts from official records — not a scoreHonesty is not numerically scored on this site. For a governor, the record that can fairly bear on it is the Adjudicated Record: findings by bodies that cannot reach a party-line verdict — a court of record, or a state body that is evenly bipartisan by rule. A final such finding caps the grade (it never raises it); nothing else here touches the number. The two ledgers that a member of Congress carries — votes against bills they endorsed, and spoken commitments tested against roll calls — do not apply to a governor, who casts no roll-call votes and leaves no uniform speech record; they are named here so their absence is a stated boundary, not a silent gap.
Adjudicated record
the only tier that can cap a gradeRecord search for Healey: 0 of 2 admitted sources connected, 0 qualifying events. The event feeds are not yet wired, so this searches no events today — a stated gap, not a finding of innocence. What is already fixed is the rule, published before any event: a cap applies only on a final finding from an admitted body (Tier 1 → F, Tier 2 → C-, Tier 3 → B).
- Admitted — Federal court judgments (deception-map offenses) (admitted by rule — event feed not yet wired)
- Admitted — MA courts of record (criminal judgments on the deception map) (admitted by rule — event feed not yet wired)
- not admitted — MA state ethics body: not shown to be evenly bipartisan by rule (or unverified); a body without a mandated partisan balance cannot cap a grade
- excluded by rule — MA legislative impeachment / removal: a legislative majority is not an evenly-bipartisan adjudicator
What this measures: findings by courts and evenly-bipartisan bodies against Healey. What it does not: truthfulness of speech, campaign promises, or anything a partisan body decided — those are excluded on purpose. Dispute anything: challenge@politicalgrades.com. Read the rulebook.
Unemployment Rate, 2010–2025
Massachusetts against all 49 other states · 2025 is an 11-month average — October 2025 was never collected (federal shutdown) Massachusetts 50-state median Other 49 states Scored window
Annual-average unemployment rate — the headline economic series, charted in full. The shaded band is its scored window: it opens with the first full calendar year after the attribution lag, so a governor sworn in mid-year starts a year later than one sworn in that January. It tracks through the newest published data. The dashed line is the 50-state median, shown for context; scoring uses the median of the other 49 states. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics.
The Record
Show the Work
every category score, and how the overall is built from them| Water quality (EPA SDWIS/ECHO) | +0.31σ · window 2024–2025 (2 pts, thin) · state 0.00pp/yr vs peers −0.24pp/yr |
| Unemployment (BLS LAUS) | −0.61σ · window 2024–2025 (2 pts, thin) · state +12.5%/yr vs peers +8.3%/yr |
| Tax burden (Census STC ÷ BEA personal income) | −0.29σ · window 2023–2024 (2 pts, thin) · state −0.77%/yr vs peers −4.6%/yr |
| Overall (citizen-weighted mean of domain scores, minus transparency) | −0.27σ = weighted −0.27σ · equal-weight −0.20σ · economy −0.61 ×.185 · fiscal −0.29 ×.137 · environment +0.31 ×.114 (weights renormalized over the domains present) |
| Methodology | v3.0, preregistered — directions and lags fixed before scoring; full dataset at /governors.json |
Each score blends two z-scores against the other states: where the state stands today (60%) and which way it moved over the category’s window (40%), capped at ±2.5σ. The trend is a fitted slope — log-linear, except where zero is a legal value (water quality), fitted linearly and reported in percentage points — measured against the median trend of the other states with enough data in the same window, 49 in most categories and fewer wherever a state-year is missing. Because standing carries the larger share, a positive score does not mean the trend improved: on 1 of the 3 scored categories on this page the two point opposite ways, which is why both columns are printed.
Cite this
Massachusetts has tracked the typical state almost exactly under Gov. Healey — an early read across 3 categories, unranked until the data thickens. — Political Grades, methodology v3.0, data through 2023–2025 by category. Provisional; trend-vs-peers scoring; relative movement, not causation.
Also Tracked in Massachusetts
the state’s other officials on this site- Sen. Edward J. Markey (D) → Massachusetts’s senator on the Congress board
- Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D) → Massachusetts’s senator on the Congress board
- Massachusetts’s House delegation — 9 members → each graded on their own legislative record
- Boston under Mayor Michelle Wu →