Gov. Grisham was elected in 2018 and sworn in on Jan. 1, 2019. Michelle Lujan Grisham is now serving a 2nd consecutive term; the current term began Jan. 2023. The scored record above covers New Mexico's outcomes during this continuous service, lagged per category (each category's lag was fixed before scoring).
Governors › New Mexico
New Mexico Under Michelle Lujan Grisham
Democratic · Sworn in Jan. 1, 2019 · Now in 2nd term
New Mexico has trailed the typical state under Gov. Grisham — No. 29 of the 29 governors ranked — 38 of 50 are rated, the other 9 are early reads held out of the ranking — across 16 categories.
The Executive Summary
Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D) has held New Mexico's governorship since Jan. 2019; on outcome trends versus the other states, New Mexico sits No. 29 of 29 ranked states, across 16 scored categories. On Grisham's watch, unemployment fell 7.9% → 4.2% while the typical state fell 7.3% → 4.0% between 2020 and 2025. Over the same service, jobless-benefit access (% of unemployed receiving UI) fell 77.8% → 24.2% while the typical state fell 72.0% → 22.8% between 2020 and 2024. In all, of the 13 scored categories with data at both ends of their measured windows, 5 moved the right way on their own numbers and 8 moved the wrong way. These are movements on the governor's watch — shared with the legislature and the economy, and the window includes COVID-19 public health emergency (WHO PHEIC: Jan 30, 2020 – May 5, 2023) and COVID-19 recession (NBER: Feb 2020 – Apr 2020) — association, not causation.
Michelle Lujan Grisham
New Mexico · Democratic · since Jan. 2019 · 2nd term
Overall · citizen-weighted
No. 29 of 29
−0.96σ · 16 of 20 categories
equal-weight: −0.96σ
weights: Pew Research Center, Jan. 2024
| Category | Latest | Score vs. peers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honesty | — | Not numerically scored — see Integrity Record | |
| Spending discipline | — | Scoring rule in development | |
| Education scale score | 256.2 ’24 | −1.96σ* | |
| Air quality AQI | 43.5 ’24 | −0.36σ | |
| Water quality % of systems with a violation | 14.6 ’25 | −0.35σ | |
| Unemployment % | 4.2 ’25 | +0.06σ | |
| Health coverage % of adults 18-64 uninsured | 14.3 ’24 | −1.42σ | |
| Tax burden % of personal income | 11.5 ’24 | −2.50σ | |
| Energy cost cents/kWh | 14.2 ’24 | +0.69σ | |
| Cost of living index, US=100 | 92.2 ’24 | +0.31σ | |
| Homicide age-adjusted deaths per 100,000 | 13.2 ’24 | −1.89σ | |
| Teen births per 1,000 females 15-19 | 18 ’24 | −0.75σ | |
| Wellbeing mean poor-mental-health days of 30 | 5.4 ’24 | −1.18σ | |
| School food quality | — | Scoring rule in development | |
| School shootings | 0 ’24 | Context · 4/10yr | |
| Obesity % of adults | 34.5 ’24 | −0.12σ | |
| Early literacy % of 4th-graders below basic | 53.1 ’24 | −1.33σ* | |
| Gun deaths age-adjusted deaths per 100,000 | 26.6 ’24 | −1.80σ | |
| Food-aid access index (higher = easier access) | 1.0 ’23 | +0.32σ | |
| Jobless-benefit access % of unemployed receiving UI | 24.2 ’24 | −0.05σ |
Data transparency — CDC BRFSS survey-years delivered: 6 of 6 in this governor’s window (the only state-run collection scored; BRFSS data through 2024)Full reporting
Each score blends where the state stands today with its trend over this governor’s window, vs. the other states with comparable data — 49 in most categories, fewer wherever a state-year is missing. Scores are in standard deviations (σ) — how far above or below the other states this one sits, where 0 is the middle of the pack and ±1 is a wide gap. *thin data (under 3 points). Tap ? on any row for what it measures, its chart, and the source. All provisional while the term runs. Methodology v3.0
The Rundown
No. 29 of 29 — below the national average on 13 of its 16 scored categories.
Energy cost. Better than the typical state, though it moved the wrong way: 12.9 → 14.2 while the typical state rose 12.3 → 14.8.
Cost of living. Better than the typical state, though it moved the wrong way: 91.8 → 92.2 while the typical state rose 94.9 → 96.7.
Tax burden (% of personal income). One of the worst in the country, and losing ground: 8.1% → 11.5% while the typical state fell 6.1% → 6.0% — opposite directions. Worst category on the card.
Moved the wrong way on Grisham's watch — 8 of 13 scored categories. energy cost 12.94 → 14.2; cost of living 91.81 → 92.21; jobless-benefit access (% of unemployed receiving UI) 77.83 → 24.16; air quality 42 → 43.5; wellbeing (mean poor-mental-health days of 30) 4.1 → 5.4; gun deaths (age-adjusted deaths per 100,000) 22.7 → 26.6; homicide (age-adjusted deaths per 100,000) 10.8 → 13.2; tax burden (% of personal income) 8.14 → 11.46. 5 moved the right way. Judged by each category's own printed endpoints over its measured years — the score also weighs standing against other states, which is a different question.
Exogenous events inside this window — 2. COVID-19 public health emergency (WHO PHEIC: Jan 30, 2020 – May 5, 2023); COVID-19 recession (NBER: Feb 2020 – Apr 2020). Years these events touch are outliers on several series — those moves belong to the events at least as much as to anyone in office, so they are marked on every chart on this page, and no verdict here rests on a single year.
How this is scored: 60% is where New Mexico stands against the other 49 states today — it is below average on 13 of 16 scored categories, and 40% is which way it moved on Gov. Grisham's watch. The same weighting applies to every governor. Because standing is the larger half, this ranks state outcomes with the sitting governor named — Gov. Grisham inherited much of it, and the movement half is what changed since.
New Mexico’s debt on their watch
context — not this governor’s gradeWhen Gov. Grisham took office in 2019, New Mexico’s state government owed $7.3 billion (fiscal 2018; Census). The latest published figure is $7.1 billion (fiscal 2024 — the Census survey runs about two years behind). A state’s debt is set by budgets a governor proposes and signs, a legislature that writes and amends them, bond votes, and the economy — it is shared, which is why it is context here and not part of the grade. Figures cover the state government only, not cities, counties or school districts — and they count bonded debt, not unfunded pension obligations, which are a separate and often large part of what a state owes. Source: Census Bureau.
And the promises beyond the bonds
Bonded debt is not the whole of what a state owes. Public pension plans in New Mexico have promised benefits valued at $62.1 billion against $31.4 billion actually held — an unfunded gap of $30.7 billion, 51% funded (2022, the latest year published). When Gov. Grisham took office, the gap stood at $35.8 billion (2018). These promises accumulated over decades, under many governors and legislatures — the most inherited numbers on this page — and the figures cover defined-benefit pension plans sponsored by state and local governments for their employees, so local-government plans are included alongside the state’s own. Source: Federal Reserve.
Integrity Record
facts from official records — not a scoreHonesty is not numerically scored on this site. For a governor, the record that can fairly bear on it is the Adjudicated Record: findings by bodies that cannot reach a party-line verdict — a court of record, or a state body that is evenly bipartisan by rule. A final such finding caps the grade (it never raises it); nothing else here touches the number. The two ledgers that a member of Congress carries — votes against bills they endorsed, and spoken commitments tested against roll calls — do not apply to a governor, who casts no roll-call votes and leaves no uniform speech record; they are named here so their absence is a stated boundary, not a silent gap.
Adjudicated record
the only tier that can cap a gradeRecord search for Grisham: 0 of 3 admitted sources connected, 0 qualifying events. The event feeds are not yet wired, so this searches no events today — a stated gap, not a finding of innocence. What is already fixed is the rule, published before any event: a cap applies only on a final finding from an admitted body (Tier 1 → F, Tier 2 → C-, Tier 3 → B).
- Admitted — Federal court judgments (deception-map offenses) (admitted by rule — event feed not yet wired)
- Admitted — NM courts of record (criminal judgments on the deception map) (admitted by rule — event feed not yet wired)
- Admitted — New Mexico State Ethics Commission (proposed, awaiting confirmation of the cited statute)
- excluded by rule — NM legislative impeachment / removal: a legislative majority is not an evenly-bipartisan adjudicator
What this measures: findings by courts and evenly-bipartisan bodies against Grisham. What it does not: truthfulness of speech, campaign promises, or anything a partisan body decided — those are excluded on purpose. Dispute anything: challenge@politicalgrades.com. Read the rulebook.
Unemployment Rate, 2010–2025
New Mexico against all 49 other states · 2025 is an 11-month average — October 2025 was never collected (federal shutdown) New Mexico 50-state median Other 49 states Scored window
Annual-average unemployment rate — the headline economic series, charted in full. The shaded band is its scored window: it opens with the first full calendar year after the attribution lag, so a governor sworn in mid-year starts a year later than one sworn in that January. It tracks through the newest published data. The dashed line is the 50-state median, shown for context; scoring uses the median of the other 49 states. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics.
The Record
Show the Work
every category score, and how the overall is built from them| Education (NAEP (Nation's Report Card)) | −1.96σ · window 2021–2024 (2 pts, thin) · state −0.54%/yr vs peers −0.07%/yr |
| Air quality (EPA AirData) | −0.36σ · window 2020–2024 (5 pts) · state +0.47%/yr vs peers +0.94%/yr |
| Water quality (EPA SDWIS/ECHO) | −0.35σ · window 2020–2025 (6 pts) · state −0.67pp/yr vs peers +0.09pp/yr |
| Unemployment (BLS LAUS) | +0.06σ · window 2020–2025 (6 pts) · state −13.1%/yr vs peers −10.7%/yr |
| Health coverage (CDC BRFSS) | −1.42σ · window 2020–2024 (5 pts) · state +1.7%/yr vs peers −6.4%/yr |
| Tax burden (Census STC ÷ BEA personal income) | −2.50σ · window 2019–2024 (6 pts) · state +11.2%/yr vs peers +1.0%/yr · raw trend −4.33σ, capped at ±2.5 |
| Energy cost (EIA) | +0.69σ · window 2020–2024 (5 pts) · state +2.1%/yr vs peers +4.8%/yr |
| Cost of living (BEA) | +0.31σ · window 2020–2024 (5 pts) · state +0.23%/yr vs peers +0.06%/yr |
| Homicide (CDC WONDER) | −1.89σ · window 2020–2024 (5 pts) · state +3.7%/yr vs peers −6.0%/yr |
| Teen births (CDC WONDER) | −0.75σ · window 2020–2024 (5 pts) · state −4.4%/yr vs peers −4.8%/yr |
| Wellbeing (CDC BRFSS) | −1.18σ · window 2020–2024 (5 pts) · state +6.6%/yr vs peers +3.4%/yr |
| Obesity (CDC BRFSS) | −0.12σ · window 2021–2024 (4 pts) · state +0.80%/yr vs peers +0.71%/yr |
| Early literacy (NAEP (Nation's Report Card)) | −1.33σ · window 2021–2024 (2 pts, thin) · state +0.76%/yr vs peers +2.2%/yr |
| Gun deaths (CDC WONDER) | −1.80σ · window 2020–2024 (5 pts) · state +2.3%/yr vs peers −1.7%/yr |
| Food-aid access (USDA FNS) | +0.32σ · window 2020–2023 (3 pts) · state −4.4%/yr vs peers +0.92%/yr |
| Jobless-benefit access (US DOL ETA) | −0.05σ · window 2020–2024 (5 pts) · state −22.3%/yr vs peers −22.0%/yr |
| Overall (citizen-weighted mean of domain scores, minus transparency) | −0.96σ = weighted −0.96σ · equal-weight −0.96σ · economy +0.35 ×.185 · health −0.87 ×.152 · environment −0.35 ×.114 · public safety −1.84 ×.147 · social services +0.14 ×.112 · education −1.64 ×.152 · fiscal −2.50 ×.137 (weights renormalized over the domains present) |
| Methodology | v3.0, preregistered — directions and lags fixed before scoring; full dataset at /governors.json |
Each score blends two z-scores against the other states: where the state stands today (60%) and which way it moved over the category’s window (40%), capped at ±2.5σ. The trend is a fitted slope — log-linear, except where zero is a legal value (water quality), fitted linearly and reported in percentage points — measured against the median trend of the other states with enough data in the same window, 49 in most categories and fewer wherever a state-year is missing. Because standing carries the larger share, a positive score does not mean the trend improved: on 5 of the 16 scored categories on this page the two point opposite ways, which is why both columns are printed.
Cite this
New Mexico has trailed the typical state under Gov. Grisham — No. 29 of the 29 governors ranked — 38 of 50 are rated, the other 9 are early reads held out of the ranking — across 16 categories. — Political Grades, methodology v3.0, data through 2023–2025 by category. Provisional; trend-vs-peers scoring; relative movement, not causation.
Also Tracked in New Mexico
the state’s other officials on this site- Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D) → New Mexico’s senator on the Congress board
- Sen. Martin Heinrich (D) → New Mexico’s senator on the Congress board
- New Mexico’s House delegation — 3 members → each graded on their own legislative record
- Albuquerque under Mayor Tim Keller →