July 20, 2026Methodology v2.2 · Data: BLS, 20102025
Political Grades
government — just the stats

CongressWashington

Emily Randall

U.S. Representative, WA-06 · Democratic · in office since Jan. 3, 2025

Emily Randall
U.S. Representative · Washington-06 · Democratic · since Jan. 2025
Chamber
House
not yet gradeable
Their own recordValue
Legislative effectiveness LES · chamber avg = 1.0Data pending
Missed votes3.4%
Ideology 0 = left · 1 = right (GovTrack)0.30
Promises keptIn human review
Washington context — not this member’s grade

House members represent a district, not the whole state, so state numbers aren’t their grade. District-level scoring is in development.

Scored on their own record; district outcome scoring is in development. Methodology v2.2

Federal spending during Randall’s current term

Total U.S. federal outlays for each fiscal year of Randall’s current term. This is the whole federal budget — mostly Social Security, Medicare, defense, interest on the debt, and prior commitments — not money Randall personally directed. A president proposes and Congress appropriates; no single official controls it.

FY25
$7.01T−$1.77T deficit

Source: OMB Historical Tables, Table 1.1 (Summary of Receipts, Outlays, and Surpluses or Deficits: 1789-present) · figures. Nominal dollars, by fiscal year (Oct–Sep).

How Randall is graded

A representative serves a district, not a state, and no honest district-level outcome trend exists yet — redistricting redrew the lines and leaves too few data points. So Randall is graded on what they control: how effectively they move legislation and how they vote. The state’s numbers are shown as context on the card, never folded into the grade, until district-level scoring ships.

Legislative Effectiveness Scores come from the Center for Effective Lawmaking, which benchmarks each chamber’s average to 1.0. Voting statistics come from GovTrack. The Honesty ledger — promises matched against this member’s votes — publishes only with an evidence trail and two agreeing human reviews.